Return to Narnia: The Last Battle

Return to Narnia: The Last BattleThe Last Battle by C.S. Lewis
Series: The Chronicles of Narnia #7
on 1956
Genres: Children's fantasy
Pages: 184
Format: eBook
Source: Purchased: ebook
Goodreads
one-half-stars
The last battle is the greatest of all battles, and the final ending the most magnificent of all endings in this, the last book of C.S. Lewis's timeless series, The Chronicles of Narnia.

This edition follows the original numbering scheme. More recent publishers have re-numbered the volumes so that the books are ordered chronologically. This was reportedly the author's preference.

This edition is numbered the same in both original and current publishing orders.

And so we come to the end.

I really don’t like this book at all. Of all of the Narnia books, this is the one that won the Carnegie (in 1956), which near as I can tell must be like when a really talented actor finally wins the Academy Award for one of their weaker performances. Because the fact that this book won an Carnegie, but that The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe was overlooked is a travesty.

Because The Last Battle, in my opinion, has little to redeem it. It is, at its most basic level, an allegory of the Book of Revelations from the Bible. Narnia perishes in darkness, and those who are chosen of Aslan are taken to his country.

But where I cannot forgive Lewis is for his treatment of Susan. Susan Pevensie haunts me, like she does many readers. She is barely mentioned in the book, a few paragraphs worth of dismissal are all that she receives, when her entire family, from Digory right through to Jill Pole, perish in a train accident and are transported to Narnia. Without her:

“Sir,” said Tirian, when he had greeted all these. “If I have read the chronicle aright, there should be another. Has not your Majesty two sisters? Where is Queen Susan?”

“My sister Susan,” answered Peter shortly and gravely, “is no longer a friend of Narnia.”

“Yes,” said Eustace, “and whenever you’ve tried to get her to come and talk about Narnia or do anything about Narnia, she says, ‘What wonderful memories you have! Fancy your still thinking about all those funny games we used to play when we were children.’”

“Oh Susan!” said Jill. “She’s interested in nothing nowadays except nylons and lipstick and invitations. She always was a jolly sight too keen on being grown-up.”

“Grown-up, indeed,” said the Lady Polly. “I wish she would grow up. She wasted all her school time wanting to be the age she is now, and she’ll waste all the rest of her life trying to stay that age. Her whole idea is to race on to the silliest time of one’s life as quick as she can and then stop there as long as she can.”

“Well, don’t let’s talk about that now,” said Peter.

Don’t let’s talk about that now? Really, Peter? When do you think you might want to talk about Susan? No one spares a thought for Susan, who is literally the only member of her family who does not perish in a fiery train crash. She is left, alone, in England. And I can’t help but think of her, grieving her siblings, and the moment that she figures out that she alone of the survivors of Narnia has been left. Because Susan may be frivolous, but she isn’t stupid.

It’s cruel. It is a cruel thing to do to a character, and I honestly can’t understand why he would do it, and dismiss her so cavalierly. I get it, I guess. He had to make some kind of a point that not everyone gets into heaven.

I reread Narnia regularly. But I never reread The Last Battle. I still remember the first time I read it. It pissed me off. Deeply. As far as I am concerned, the series is better without it. About the only thing that I like about the book is that Reepicheep reappears in Aslan’s Country. I don’t recommend it. Stop with The Magician’s Nephew.

Neal Gaiman wrote a fascinating and more than a little disturbing short story called “The Problem of Susan”. You can find it here: here.

One comment

  1. Cleo @ Classical Carousel says:

    Did the manner in which Susan was treated ruin the whole book for you? I was a little annoyed because, as you said, she was an important character who readers had invested time and emotion energy in, and he communicated her fate with a mere couple of sentences. I was hoping for more than that. However, when I thought about it, I felt perhaps it was so brief because it is not important to the story, and to make more of it would have created an imbalance in the narrative. In any case, I loved this book. It brought together all the other books for me and exposed themes that I had totally missed. Lewis is absolutely amazing with how he imbeds so many higher concepts into a children’s novel ….. from reality and knowledge to Pascal and Plato …… Wow! The eschatology in this book I found fascinating. Nothing lasts forever and Lewis did a masterful job of describing the end of time ……. yet for the characters in the real Narnia, it is only the beginning …… :-)
    Cleo @ Classical Carousel recently posted…Madame Bovary Read-Along Part IIMy Profile

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge